Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Jun 2020

Mosquito Community and West Nile Virus Risk on a National Guard Training Base in Oklahoma

,
,
,
,
, and
Page Range: 81 – 88
DOI: 10.2987/20-6928.1
Save
Download PDF

ABSTRACT

Military bases are important areas for mosquito surveillance to maintain active duty combat readiness and protect training exercises. The aim of this study was to assist Camp Gruber National Guard training facility personnel to assess their mosquito community and West Nile virus (WNV) risk using biweekly sampling of 50 sites. Between May and October 2018, 10,259 adult female mosquitoes consisting of 6 genera and 26 species were collected over 662 trap-nights using 2 trap types. The most commonly collected genus was Culex (72.2% of total), followed by Psorophora (13.3%) and Aedes (10.2%). Of note, most of the medically important species were collected in the area containing troop living quarters, including 1 WNV-positive pool of Culex tarsalis. Two specimens of Aedes aegypti were collected around a vehicle storage area. While smaller in land mass size than many other active military bases in Oklahoma, the diversity of species at Camp Gruber was comparable to collections from 4 larger bases in Oklahoma. These data demonstrate the need for regular season-long mosquito monitoring of training bases to protect the health of active duty and reserve military personnel.

INTRODUCTION

Mosquito-borne infectious diseases are a major public health concern in the USA, with West Nile virus (WNV) currently the most significant in the USA (Curren et al. 2018, Rosenberg et al. 2018). The recent outbreaks of arboviral (dengue, chikungunya, and Zika viruses) diseases in Central and South America have caused US-based mosquito monitoring efforts to focus on Aedes aegypti (L.) and Ae. albopictus (Skuse). Surveillance efforts funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have characterized mosquito communities in different regions (Goddard et al. 2017, Kovach and Smith 2018), but the Great Plains remains one of the least studied regions with regard to the ecology of mosquito vectors (Bradt et al. 2019).

Communities most at-risk of outbreaks of mosquito-transmitted diseases include areas of high human population movement (Sutherst 2004). Military bases and operations are characterized by rapid changes in human populations. These changes involve: 1) a rapid deployment of troops; 2) a return from regional or national deployment; 3) an influx of troops coming on base for training exercises and then leaving; 4) base staff who maintain operations; and 5) materials, primarily machinery that is driven or flown into the base from regional or national bases or even foreign countries. These factors could create conditions for a mosquito-borne disease outbreak, which could impair troop readiness (Moore 1999, Cofrancesco et al. 2007) and potentially introduce new species to a region. Because of these recognized risks, mosquito surveillance of active military installations has been conducted since World War II (Foley et al. 2011).

However, not all military installations are equally prepared for potential mosquito-borne disease outbreaks. Active military bases are full-time installations where military personnel work, train, and often live within the confines of the base. Active bases also have federal funds for arthropod monitoring and management programs run by full-time personnel, which increase the chances of detecting introduced or infected mosquitoes (McHugh and Vande Berg 1989, McHugh 1991, Moore 1999, McPhatter et al. 2012). In contrast, military installations used by reserve personnel, such as National Guard training facilities, usually have a small permanent operating staff and limited resources for arthropod monitoring and management. These training facilities are frequently occupied briefly by hundreds or even thousands of troops that come to the facility for 2–14 days before dispersing once their training period is finished. Because of the frequency of these movements of soldiers and equipment on military bases, these training facilities may be at greater risk for the establishment and population increase of imported mosquitoes and their associated diseases. Therefore, adequate funding and consistent surveillance on these facilities is necessary to protect base and transitioning personnel from mosquito-borne disease and to prevent the establishment of exotic species.

Oklahoma has both active bases and reserve training facilities. Camp Gruber in Muskogee County (east-central Oklahoma) is an Oklahoma Army National Guard training facility for weekend drills and 2-wk summer training exercises, which is also used for law enforcement training, pre- and postdeployment processing of troops, and for seasonal public hunting. To assist the training center in determining potential risk for mosquito-borne disease, the aims of this study were: 1) to assess the community of host-seeking adult female mosquitoes and nearby larval habitats on Camp Gruber; 2) to test for WNV infection in the main mosquito species involved in transmission in Oklahoma (Culex pipiens L. and Cx. tarsalis Coquillett); and 3) compare abundance of adult mosquito communities at Camp Gruber with 4 other active Oklahoma military bases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study site

The primary mosquito collections in this study were carried out at Camp Gruber Training Center, an Army National Guard facility occasionally used by other military personnel and police task forces and seasonal public hunting. Located in Muskogee County, OK, Camp Gruber encompasses approximately 22,500 ha (55,680 acres). The town of Braggs, OK (population 257), is directly adjacent to the southeastern edge of Camp Gruber. The base has a cantonment area (250 ha) and firing ranges (185 ha), with the remainder a mixture of grassland and forest with streams and ponds with the southeastern corner bordered by Greenleaf Lake (370 ha). The western cantonment area has most of the living quarters, administrative headquarters, and service offices for personnel while the eastern cantonment area contains vehicle and equipment storage areas.

Sampling protocol

For the study, 50 collection locations approved by base personnel were selected using reports of mosquito activity, troop activity, and training area access. Between April and October 2018, a total of 23 collection trips (46 sampling dates) occurred biweekly. Trapping occurred using 2 types of traps: modified CDC light traps (Bioquip®, Rancho Dominguez, CA) and BioGents® (BG) Sentinel traps (BioGents, Regensburg, Germany). The CDC light traps, modified by removing the light source, were paired with 1-liter insulated containers containing dry ice as a carbon dioxide source and were suspended approximately 1.5 m above the ground. The BG Sentinel traps were placed on the ground under vegetation, and the battery was placed inside the trap for protection from wildlife. Each time traps were checked, all captured mosquitoes were removed and placed into labeled containers and placed into a mobile freezer set at approximately −8°C. Upon return to the laboratory, mosquitoes were transferred to a −20°C freezer and stored until identification.

During the study period, traps were set on Friday, between 10:00 and 13:00 h, and then checked between 05:30 and 11:00 h each of the next 2 mornings. After the 1st night, dry ice was replenished for the CDC light traps. On the last day, traps were collected. During the 1st sampling week, 20 traps (15 BG Sentinel traps and 5 CDC light traps) were used. Thereafter, 30 traps (10 BG Sentinel traps and 20 CDC light traps) were deployed each week at randomly selected trap sites, chosen from the 50 approved sites. Out of 662 trapping events, 238 used BG Sentinel traps and 424 used modified CDC light traps. Scheduled activities, including training with live ammunition and movement of military equipment, prohibited access to some trap sites during scheduled sampling periods. As a result, one sampling trip (September 13–14) occurred during the week and during 2 other scheduled sampling periods (June 9–11 and 22–24); traps were placed at locations of a concurrent study of the American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus Olivier.

Mosquitoes were identified to species using a Labom stereoscope (Luxeo 4Z Stereozoom Microscope; Labo America Inc., Fremont, CA) and established keys (Darsie and Ward 2005). Our sites were located in a hybrid zone, so references to Cx. pipiens denote the Cx. pipiens/quinquefasciatus complex. After identification, mosquitoes were separated by species, location of capture, and date of capture, then placed into containers and returned to the freezer. Over the sampling season, damaged or unknown specimens were confirmed by Lisa Coburn, Justin Talley, and Bruce Noden of Oklahoma State University. Unidentified mosquitoes were not included in the results. Because of their known role in WNV transmission in Oklahoma (Noden et al. 2015), all female Cx. pipiens and Cx. tarsalis were pooled by date and trap site and sent to the Army Public Health Center in Maryland for WNV testing.

Larval sampling

During adult trapping at Camp Gruber, water bodies and containers holding water within 100 m of each trap were sampled. Samples were collected with a mosquito dipping cup (Bioquip) and larval mosquitoes were stored in 70% ethanol in 2-ml vials (VWR, Radnor, PA) after collection. All 4th instars were identified using larval dichotomous keys (Darsie and Ward 2005) and a Labom stereoscope. Species, collection location, and date were recorded.

Aedes aegypti confirmation assay

Samples of DNA were extracted from the head of a larva and legs of an adult tentatively identified as Ae. aegypti using a GeneJET Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (ThermoScientific, Grand Island, NY). The positive control was legs of an adult Ae. aegypti Liverpool strain. Then, 20 μl of Proteinase K and 180 μl of digestion solution were added to the 2 samples, and each was incubated overnight at 56°C on a shaker. The next day, extraction was completed following the manufacturer protocol and the extracted DNA samples were stored at −20°C. The extracted DNA was tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers that amplify a 361-bp region of the ND4 mosquito gene (da Costa da Silva et al. 2005): ND4-Forward primer (5′-ATTGCCTAAGG CTCATGTAG-3′) and ND4 Reverse (5′-TCGGCTTCCTAGTCGTTCAT-3′). Positive amplicons were extracted from the 2% agarose gel using an Invitrogen PureLink Quick Gel Extraction Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and sent to the Oklahoma State University Core Facility to be bidirectionally sequenced. Resulting consensus sequences were compared with GenBank submissions using default conditions on NCBI BLAST (National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD) where the highest percent sequence identity was used to determine species similarity.

Comparison with other Oklahoma bases

The mosquito community at Camp Gruber was compared with data from an earlier study collected between May and September 2016 (Bradt et al. 2019) at 4 military installations in Oklahoma: Vance Air Force Base (Enid, Garfield County), Tinker Air Force Base (Oklahoma City, Oklahoma County), Altus Air Force Base (Altus, Jackson County), and Fort Sill Military Post (Lawton, Comanche County). Differing from the current study, Bradt et al. (2019) used CDC gravid traps baited with water infused with decomposed Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon [L.]) in addition to CDC light traps (CO2) and BG Sentinel traps with a similar overnight trapping protocol. To attain comparable results between studies, catch per trap-night was calculated with 1 trap-night = 1 trap for a calendar date.

Statistical analysis

West Nile virus infection rates were calculated on pooled mosquitoes as minimum infection rates (MIR) per 1,000 females using PooledInfRate, a CDC-provided Microsoft Excel add-on (Biggerstaff 2006). Mosquito infection data were parsed by collection site. The MIR was used instead of maximum likelihood estimate because of small, uneven pool numbers (Fryxell et al. 2014).

RESULTS

Adult mosquito collections

A total of 10,259 adult female mosquitoes consisting of 6 genera and 26 species were collected at Camp Gruber between May and October 2018 over 662 trap-nights (Table 1). The most commonly collected genus was Culex (72.2% of total), with the most common species, Cx. erraticus (Dyar and Knab) (70.4% of all mosquitoes collected), averaging >10/trap-night. The 2nd most common genus was Psorophora (13.3%), followed by Aedes (10.2%), with Ae. vexans (Meigen) (72.7%) representing the majority of Aedes collected. The remaining 435 mosquitoes belonged to Anopheles, Toxorhynchites rutilus septentrionalis Dyar and Knab, and Uranotaenia sapphirina (Osten Sacken).

Table 1 Summary of larval and adult female mosquitoes collected on Camp Gruber, Oklahoma, during 2018. Includes number of adult mosquitoes collected by BioGents Sentinel traps (BG) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention light traps (CDC).
Table 1

Of the mosquitoes collected during the study, 4,093 (39.9%) were collected in 18 (36% of total) traps distributed around the western cantonment area. The majority of mosquitoes of medical importance were also collected in this area: 96 Cx. pipiens (59%), 18 Cx. tarsalis (56%), 129 Ae. albopictus (79%), 643 Psorophora columbiae (Dyar and Knab) (71%), and 548 Ae. vexans (72%). The majority of Cx. erraticus (65%) were collected from one trap in the southern part of the base, but 2,342 (32%) were collected in the western cantonment area. The majority of Anopheles quadrimaculatus Say (88%) were also collected in the southern part of the base.

Modified CDC light traps captured 25 species, whereas the BG Sentinel traps collected only 14 species (Table 1). Of the 10,259 identified mosquitoes, 10,095 (98.4%) were collected from the CDC light traps, and the remaining 164 (1.6%) were from BG Sentinel traps. The CDC light traps collected an average of 23.70 mosquitoes per trap-night, while the BG Sentinel traps averaged 0.69 mosquitoes per trap-night. The majority of mosquitoes collected with CDC light traps were Culex spp. (73.0%), followed by Psorophora spp. (13.0%), and Aedes spp. (9.7%) in addition to Anopheles spp. and Uranotaenia spp. In contrast, the BG Sentinel traps collected primarily Aedes spp. (42.7%) in addition to Toxorhynchites spp. (Table 1).

Seasonal trends

Mosquito species peaked in different months throughout the sampling period. Aedes albopictus and Cx. tarsalis peaked in July and August (Fig. 1A), whereas Cx. pipiens increased as the sampling season ended in October. Similar to other species, An. quadrimaculatus and Ps. columbiae numbers both peaked in August while Ae. vexans peaked during September (Fig. 1B). Culex erraticus also peaked in August, increasing into the thousands during a short period of activity (data not shown).

Fig. 1. . Monthly abundance of (A) 3 important potential disease vectors, and (B) 3 important mosquito species on Camp Gruber, Oklahoma, during 2018.Fig. 1. . Monthly abundance of (A) 3 important potential disease vectors, and (B) 3 important mosquito species on Camp Gruber, Oklahoma, during 2018.Fig. 1. . Monthly abundance of (A) 3 important potential disease vectors, and (B) 3 important mosquito species on Camp Gruber, Oklahoma, during 2018.
Fig. 1 Monthly abundance of (A) 3 important potential disease vectors, and (B) 3 important mosquito species on Camp Gruber, Oklahoma, during 2018.

Citation: Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 36, 2; 10.2987/20-6928.1

Larval counts

A total of 743 larvae were collected of which 166 were identified to species (Table 1). The remaining larvae were not 4th instars and could not be positively identified using available keys. The identified larvae represented 4 genera and 10 species, with the most represented genus being Psorophora (4 species). No species was collected only as a larva although more Ps. mathesoni Belkin and Heinemann larvae (5) were collected than adults (2) (Table 1).

WNV results

A total of 90 pools (n = 194) of Culex mosquitoes were tested for WNV: Cx. pipiens (69 pools—162 mosquitoes) and Cx. tarsalis (21 pools—32 mosquitoes). One pool consisting of a single Cx. tarsalis was WNV-positive, producing a Cx. tarsalis prevalence of 3.1% (MIR of 31.2/1,000 mosquitoes). The positive pool was collected near the residential areas of the base in a group of eastern red cedar trees (Juniperus virginiana L.) on August 25, about 0.2 km from the elementary school in Braggs, OK.

Aedes aegypti confirmation assay

Two Ae. aegypti samples from Camp Gruber tested using PCR were confirmed using NCBI BLAST with 100% sequence identity with known sequences of Ae. aegypti (KX580042.1), whereas the positive control had 100% sequence identity with a known sequence of Liverpool strain (MF194022.1).

Oklahoma military installations comparison

Despite variable trap efforts and comparison of different years, all Oklahoma military institutions produced at least 4 genera and between 12 and 22 mosquito species. The 6 genera and 26 species collected at Camp Gruber are comparable with the 4 genera and 22 species collected at Fort Sill, with fewer species collected at Altus Air Force Base (4 genera; 16 species), Tinker Air Force Base (5 genera; 17 species), and Vance Air Force Base (4 genera; 12 species). Camp Gruber had the longest sampling period and produced the most diversity in genera and species (Table 2). Culex pipiens was the most abundant species collected on 3 bases (Altus, Fort Sill, Vance) while Ps. columbiae was most abundant on 2 bases (Camp Gruber and Fort Sill) (Table 2).

Table 2 Mean captures of mosquitoes per trap-night on Oklahoma military bases (Vance, Tinker, Altus, Fort Sill) during 2016 compared with mean captures on Camp Gruber during 2018. Numbers <1 indicate that fewer than 1 individual per trap-night was captured during sampling. Numbers in boldface indicate the top 2 collected species on the specific military base.
Table 2

DISCUSSION

As the 1st study to characterize the mosquito community on a National Guard training facility in Oklahoma, the data reveal important information about the mosquito community and potential risks for mosquito-borne diseases on military training facilities. Camp Gruber has an abundant and diverse mosquito community. While the traps were more numerous and geographically more widespread than those placed on 4 active Oklahoma military bases for an earlier survey during 2016 (Bradt et al. 2019), Camp Gruber had similar diversity of mosquitoes (Table 2). The abundance of various species on Camp Gruber highlights important landscape factors that can be used for future mosquito control strategies. The presence of open, low-lying areas of grass that are prone to periodic flooding were common in training areas. The high capture rate for the 2 aggressive nuisance-biting floodwater species, Ae. vexans (50% of total) and Ps. columbiae (45% of total), occurred in these areas approximately 10–14 days after a heavy (12.5 cm) rain (Weather Underground; The Weather Company, San Francisco, CA).

While no larvae were collected, adult female Cx. erraticus was the most abundant species collected in this study. Its larvae are associated with the fringes of creeks and rivers as reported by Robertson et al. (1993). Primarily a bird-feeding species that transitions to mammals later in the season, Cx. erraticus has been documented with natural infections of eastern equine encephalitis (EEE) virus and WNV (Harrison et al. 2009, Mendenhall et al. 2012, Mukherjee et al. 2012, Godsey et al. 2013, Bingham et al. 2016). Culex erraticus is a potential bridge vector (Cupp et al. 2003, 2004; Cohen et al. 2009; Lindsey et al. 2018) reported nonhuman cases of EEE in 4 counties and at least 1 human case along the Arkansas–Oklahoma border. They also reported nonhuman cases in McCurtain and Tulsa counties. More than 4,300 Cx. erraticus were captured on a single weekend (10–14 days after receiving 12.5 cm of rain), as well as high numbers of An. quadrimaculatus (53%), from an area disturbed by feral pigs in the Camp Gruber training area beside Greenleaf Lake in the southeast corner of the property. While this was not confirmed during this study, wild pigs have been implicated in facilitating mosquito breeding in other parts of the world (Nogueira-Filho et al. 2009).

The 2 main Culex species involved in WNV transmission in Oklahoma, Cx. pipiens and Cx. tarsalis, as well as Ae. albopictus were found throughout the training facility, but the majority of all 3 species were collected in the cantonment area. This is particularly important as this is the area in which the small cadre of camp personnel work daily and where training reservists stay on base and relax after training. These medically important species became more abundant in August into October, with Ae. albopictus (45%) and Cx. tarsalis (59%) numbers peaking in August and Cx. pipiens (46%) peaking in mid-October, each 2 wk after separate 12.5-cm rain events. The fact that the majority of all 3 species were collected in the cantonment area suggests a possible influence of anthropogenic factors including habitat for larvae and ample blood meals for host-seeking adult females. The risk of mosquito activity in this area was highlighted by collection of the only WNV-infected mosquito pool, <0.2 km from the local elementary school in the adjacent town of Braggs.

The discovery of 2 separate specimens of Ae. aegypti was also important. Aedes aegypti is a well-known vector for a variety of important arboviruses, including dengue, chikungunya, and Zika viruses. Not recorded in Oklahoma for >70 years, Ae. aegypti was recently collected in a variety of urban areas in southcentral and western Oklahoma (Bradt et al. 2019, Sanders 2019). Other than a few reports of Ae. aegypti on Tinker Air Force Base 2 decades ago (McHugh and Hanny 1990), this was the 1st documented collection of the species on a military base in Oklahoma. These specimens were collected almost 3 km from the cantonment area at a location of recently translocated heavy equipment (backhoes and front-end loaders) from out of state and an abandoned car used for training purposes. This further emphasizes the need for vigilance with regard to the ability of this species to establish on military bases unintentionally through equipment movement (Cofrancesco et al. 2007, Dallimore et al. 2017).

There was a disparity between the numbers of mosquitoes collected by the 2 different types of traps used in the study. This may have occurred because there were fewer BG Sentinel traps used than CDC light traps, a difference of 238 and 426 trapping events, respectively. However, even with these disparities, the composition of mosquitoes collected was notably distinct as BG Sentinel traps primarily collected Aedes spp., followed by Culex spp., while CDC light traps primarily collected Culex spp., followed by Psorophora spp. (Table 1). These distinctions are important when determining a sampling protocol for targeted mosquito surveillance on a military training base. While CDC light traps are known to collect a wide diversity of mosquito species (Reiskind et al. 2017), it may be necessary to use BG Sentinel traps in areas that are more concerned with arboviruses transmitted by Aedes spp.

Among Oklahoma military bases, Camp Gruber had the highest diversity of genera and species while no studied military facilities had the same 2 highest collected species. This was possibly due to a higher number of trap-nights, trap placement, and a longer sampling season compared with the 4 other military bases (Bradt et al. 2019) in addition to ecological differences and local weather conditions at the time of each study. In terms of species, Camp Gruber had the greatest diversity of Aedes spp. and Psorophora spp. while Fort Sill had the greatest diversity of Anopheles spp. More Culex spp. were collected at all previously sampled bases when compared with Camp Gruber. However, Cx. erraticus was collected at Camp Gruber in greater numbers than any other species on any other base. Additionally, both Tx. r. septentrionalis and Ur. sapphirina were collected only at Camp Gruber.

In conclusion, larval and adult mosquito surveillance was conducted at Camp Gruber between May and October 2018, resulting in the collection of 6 genera and 26 species. The majority of the important vector species were collected in the cantonment area. Ninety pools (n = 164) of Cx. pipiens and Cx. tarsalis were tested for WNV and 1 pool of Cx. tarsalis tested positive. The knowledge that the cantonment areas containing living quarters for visiting soldiers produced the majority of medically important mosquitoes along with the only WNV-infected pool provided important information to the National Guard command to evaluate mosquito control protocols and change the landscape factors that are contributing to the production of mosquitoes. Detection of Ae. aegypti in a region of the state where it has not been collected since the 1940s highlights the need for vigilance using regular surveys. All of these components factor into providing safety for incoming and outgoing troops in any military training facility.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Lisa Coburn for assistance with mosquito identification and confirmation, Larry Livesay, Rusty Dause and the Range Control staff, specifically SFC Ricardo Pineda and SSG George Lawrence, for assistance with establishing sampling sites, general consultations, and advising for general safety considerations on base, the Army Public Health Command for assistance in WNV testing, and Noel Cote, Jacob Farriester, Jordan Sanders, Leonardo Santos, and Mason Taylor for assistance with mosquito collection and advice. This research was funded by the Oklahoma National Guard, LW was supported in part by the Niblack Research Scholars program, and BHN and BK were partially funded by the Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station.

REFERENCES CITED

  • Biggerstaff BJ.
    2006. PooledInfRate. Version 3.0: a Microsoft Excel Add-In to compute prevalence estimates from pooled samples[Internet].
    Fort Collins, CO
    :
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    [accessed July 20, 2020]. Accessed at: https://www.cdc.gov/westnile/resourcepages/ mosqSurvSoft.html

  • Bingham AM,
    Burkett-Cadena ND,
    Hassan HK,
    Unnasch TR.
    2016. Vector competence and capacity of Culex erraticus (Diptera: Culicidae) for eastern equine encephalitis virus in the southeastern United States. J Med Entomol53:473476.

  • Bradt D,
    Wormington JD,
    Long JM,
    Hoback WW,
    Noden BH.
    2019. Differences in mosquito communities in six cities in Oklahoma. J Med Entomol56:13951403.

  • Cofrancesco AF Jr,
    Reaves DR,
    Averett DE.
    2007. Transfer of invasive species associated with the movement of military equipment and personnel[Internet].
    Vicksburg MS
    :
    Engineer Research and Development Center, Environmental Lab, Legacy Resource Management Program
    [accessed February 25, 2020]. Available from: https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a470914.pdf.

  • Cohen SB,
    Lewoczko K,
    Huddleston DB,
    Moody E,
    Mukherjee S,
    Dunn JR,
    Jones TF,
    Wilson R,
    Moncayo AC.
    2009. Host feeding patterns of potential vectors of eastern equine encephalitis virus at an epizootic focus in Tennessee. Am J Trop Med Hyg81:452456.

  • Cupp EW,
    Klingler K,
    Hassan HK,
    Vlguers LM,
    Unnasch TR.
    2003. Transmission of eastern equine encephalomyelitis virus in central Alabama. Am J Trop Med Hyg68:495500.

  • Cupp EW,
    Tennessen KJ,
    Oldland WK,
    Hassan HK,
    Hill GE,
    Katholi CR,
    Unnasch TR.
    2004. Mosquito and arbovirus activity during 1997–2002 in a wetland in northeastern Mississippi. J Med Entomol41:495501.

  • Curren EJ,
    Lehman J,
    Kolsin J,
    Walker WL,
    Martin SW,
    Staples JE,
    Hills SL,
    Gould CV,
    Rabe IB,
    Fischer M,
    Lindsey NP.
    2018. West Nile virus and other nationally notifiable arboviral diseases—United States, 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep67:11371142.

  • da Costa da Silva AL,
    Capurro ML,
    Bracco JE,
    . 2005. Genetic lineages in the yellow fever mosquito Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) from Peru. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz100:539544.

  • Dallimore T,
    Hunter T,
    Medlock JM,
    Vaux AGC,
    Harbach RE,
    Strode C.
    2017. Discovery of a single male Aedes aegypti (L.) in Merseyside, England. Parasit Vectors10:309.

  • Darsie RF Jr,
    Ward RA.
    2005. Identification and geographical distribution of the mosquitoes of North America, north of Mexico.
    Gainesville, FL
    :
    Univ. Press of Florida
    .

  • Foley DH,
    Maloney FA,
    Harrison FJ,
    Wilkerson RC,
    Rueda LM.
    2011. Online spatial database of US Army Public Health Command Region-West mosquito surveillance records: 1947–2009. US Army Med Dep JJul–Sep:29–36.

  • Fryxell RT,
    Lewis TT,
    Peace H,
    Hendricks BB,
    Paulsen D.
    2014. Identification of avian malaria (Plasmodium sp.) and canine heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) in the mosquitoes of Tennessee. J Parasitol100:455462.

  • Goddard J,
    Moraru GM,
    Mcinnis SJ,
    Portugal JS,
    Yee DA,
    Deerman JH,
    Varnado WC.
    2017. A statewide survey for container-breeding mosquitoes in Mississippi. J Am Mosq Control Assoc33:229232.

  • Godsey MS Jr,
    King RJ,
    Burkhalter K,
    Delorey M,
    Colton L,
    Charnetzky D,
    Sutherland G,
    Ezenwa VO,
    Wilson LA,
    Coffey M.
    2013. Ecology of potential West Nile virus vectors in Southeastern Louisiana: enzootic transmission in the relative absence of Culex quinquefasciatus. Am J Trop Med Hyg88:986996.

  • Harrison BA,
    Whitt PB,
    Roberts LF,
    Lehman JA,
    Lindsey NP,
    Nasci RS,
    Hansen GR.
    2009. Rapid assessment of mosquitoes and arbovirus activity after floods in southeastern Kansas, 2007. J Am Mosq Control Assoc25:265271.

  • Kovach KB,
    Smith RC.
    2018. Surveillance of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Southern Iowa, 2016. J Med Entomol55:13411345.

  • Lindsey NP,
    Staples JE,
    Fischer M.
    2018. Eastern equine encephalitis virus in the United States, 2003–2016. Am J Trop Med Hyg98:14721477.

  • McHugh C.
    1991. Distributional records from the US Air Force ovitrapping program—1990. J Am Mosq Control Assoc7:499501.

  • McHugh C,
    Hanny P.
    1990. Records of Aedes albopictus, Ae. aegypti and Ae. triseriatus from the US Air Force ovitrapping program—1989. J Am Mosq Control Assoc6:549551.

  • McHugh C,
    Vande Berg A.
    1989. Records of Aedes albopictus, Ae. aegypti and Ae. triseriatus from the US Air Force ovitrapping program: 1988. J Am Mosq Control Assoc5:440443.

  • McPhatter L,
    Roachell W,
    Mahmood F,
    Hoffman L,
    Lockwood N,
    Osuna A,
    Lopez J,
    Debboun M.
    2012. Vector surveillance to determine species composition and occurrence of Trypanosoma cruzi infection at three military installations in San Antonio, Texas. Army Med Dept J1221:1221.

  • Mendenhall IH,
    Tello SA,
    Neira LA,
    Castillo LF,
    Ocampo CB,
    Wesson DM.
    2012. Host preference of the arbovirus vector Culex erraticus (Diptera: Culicidae) at Sonso Lake, Cauca Valley Department, Colombia. J Med Entomol49:10921102.

  • Moore JP.
    1999. Mosquitoes of Fort Campbell, Kentucky (Diptera: Culicidae). J Am Mosq Control Assoc15:13.

  • Mukherjee S,
    Moody EE,
    Lewokzco K,
    Huddleston DB,
    Huang J,
    Rowland ME,
    Wilson R,
    Dunn JR,
    Jones TF,
    Moncayo AC.
    2012. Eastern equine encephalitis in Tennessee: 2002–2008. J Med Entomol49:731738.

  • Noden BH,
    Coburn L,
    Wright R,
    Bradley K.
    2015. An updated checklist of the mosquitoes of Oklahoma including new state records and West Nile virus vectors, 2003–06. J Am Mosq Control Assoc31:336345.

  • Nogueira-Filho SLG,
    Nogueira SSC,
    Fragoso JMV.
    2009. Ecological impacts of feral pigs in the Hawaiian Islands. Biodivers Conserv18:3677.

  • Reiskind MH,
    Griffin RH,
    Janairo MS,
    Hopperstad KA.
    2017. Mosquitoes of field and forest: the scale of habitat segregation in a diverse mosquito assemblage. Med Vet Entomol31:4454.

  • Robertson LC,
    Prior S,
    Apperson CS,
    Irby WS.
    1993. Bionomics of Anopheles quadrimaculatus and Culex erraticus (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Falls Lake Basin, North Carolina: seasonal changes in abundance and gonotrophic status, and host-feeding patterns. J Med Entomol30:689698.

  • Rosenberg R,
    Lindsey NP,
    Fischer M,
    Gregory CJ,
    Hinckley AF,
    Mead PS,
    Paz-Bailey G,
    Waterman SH,
    Drexler NA,
    Kersh GJ,
    Hooks H,
    Partridge SK,
    Visser SN,
    Beard CB,
    Petersen LR.
    2018. Vital Signs: Trends in reported vector-borne disease cases—United States and territories 2004–2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep67:496501.

  • Sanders JD.
    2019. Distribution of container-breeding mosquitoes in urban areas of southern Oklahoma. M.S. thesis.
    Oklahoma State University
    ,
    Stillwater, OK
    .

  • Sutherst RW.
    2004. Global change and human vulnerability to vector-borne diseases. Clin Microbiol Rev17:136173.

Copyright: Copyright © 2020 by The American Mosquito Control Association, Inc.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Monthly abundance of (A) 3 important potential disease vectors, and (B) 3 important mosquito species on Camp Gruber, Oklahoma, during 2018.


Contributor Notes

To whom correspondence should be addressed.
  • Download PDF